expresivitate suprema, vulnerabilitate, carne vie.----
ma induioseaza...
Uneori ascult fiecare clip in parte, alteori le pornesc pe toate simultan.
Camera se umple de o placuta rumoare gainsbourgiana ...
dintr-un acvariu cu fisuri ...
expresivitate suprema, vulnerabilitate, carne vie.----
ma induioseaza...
insa m-a dat gata in "the Descendants"...
Vreau sa ia el Oscaru` diseara. Stiu ca toti tin cu francezul din "the Artist", cica e un rol extrem de dificil, bla bla bla, insa dupa mine, e usor sa interpretezi un "rol dificil". Ai multe repere de care sa te agati.
Mult mai greu e sa interpretezi un rol lipsit de dificultate.
Fara sa vrea, Clooney cu privirea lui "descumpanita", mi l-a readus in minte pe inegalabilul Mastroianni.
Inca o carte despre WWII ...
Fateful Choices:
Ten Decisions That Changed the World, 1940-1941
by Ian Kershaw
in care se pune intrebarea:
Oare deznodamintul acestui razboi, care a izbucnit datorita conditiilor istorico-social-politico-economice, etc and whatever ...,
sa se fi datorat superioritatii tactico-strategice ale fortelor armate ale Aliatilor, miscarii de rezistenta, bisericii, nationalismului, patriotismului ...? sau
a fost rezultatul unor coincidente si accidente, a unor pasi grabiti de balet lipsit de coreograf, executati de citeva personaje dominate de viziuni nebunatice si nedemonstrabile, dar care,
prin incapatinarea lor, prin carisma lor sau lipsa ei, au reusit sa-si impuna deciziile ?
Autorul alege varianta dansului accidental si confera rolul primei balerine, lui Churchill !!
"In view of all this, we must return to the underlying premise so eloquently propounded by Kershaw: that the major events of World War II were the work of individuals.Adica, cu cu alte cuvinte... Read More...
In August 1939, Hitler and Stalin agreed to smash Poland and to re-divide Eastern Europe, yet no more than a handful of assistants had advance knowledge of all this.
Without Churchill's eloquence and dynamism, the war against Nazism would have come to an end nearly as soon as it started.
Hitler and Hitler alone decided to invade the Soviet Union. Roosevelt and his trusted associates prepared the United States for war. And it was only when the emperor of Japan nodded his head that a mighty Japanese fleet, loaded with attack aircraft, sailed for Hawaii.[...]
And so events took their inexorable course. This led to victory for the Western democracies, but it led to victory, too, for Stalin's tyrannical empire." (Recomand recenzia acestei carti, scrisa de Istvan Deak , un admirabil jurnalist si un excelent profesor in astfel de subiecte. De multe ori analize si recenzii mult mai satisfacatoare decit cartile analizate ...)
Convingere ferma si profunda a lui Churchill ca nazismul ar fi fost un mai mare dusman pentru Anglia decit comunismul, a reusit sa rastoarne pozitia majoritara a cabinetului de a negocia cu Hitler prin intermediul lui Mussolini (Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax ...) "Without the London government's resolve not to negotiate with the Nazis, the European struggle might have ended then and there. All other decisions would have become superfluous, or would at least have been very different ..."
Din cauza celor de mai sus, cica ar fi decis Hitler atacul asupra URSS, ... o miscare nu prea bine gindita. Hitler (care cucerise Polonia, Franta ...) a fost totalmente buimacit de pozitia Londrei,
asa ca s-a gindit ca daca ii va anihila si pe rusi (o miscare pentru care nu era pregatit, insa care i se parea "floare la ureche")..., poate ca Anglia se va lasa impresionata ...
Taman atunci Japonezii, cu urechea la Emperor, incercind sa-i interpreteze versetele, au hotarit sa-si mute fortele armate din nordul tarii, inspre sud ..., lasind nordul la indemina rusilor ...,
in timp ce ...
Mussolini a decis sa atace Franta, sa-i bata pe englezi in Egipt, dupa care sa invadeze Grecia ...
"What passed [in Rome] for dictatorial decisiveness was in reality the merest veneer of half-baked assumptions, superficial observations, amateurish judgment, and wholly uncritical assessment."
Italienii ca aliati au creat mai multe probleme nemtilor ..., decit inamicii oficiali (ca Franta).
Si Stalin a fost totalmente luat prin surpriza de atacul nepregatit al nemtilor, ... el se gindise sa se razboiasca cu ei, dar ceva mai incolo (peste un an macar), cind echipamentul armatei ar fi iesit din "fabrica" ... Plus ca isi omorise cu putin inainte, mare parte din elita lui militara, si tot asa ...
dar mai cititi si voi ...
si iata aceeasi compozitie transpusa intr-un show burlesc, specific semnaturii lui "Lady GaGa".
E de semnalat si magnetismul interactiei cu publicul...
marele pictor Lucien Freud, la 88 de ani,
si..., tulburatoarea, dar mult tulburata Amy Winehouse, la doar 27.


Yes, the body is a hideous thing,
the feet and genitals especially,
the human face not far behind. Blue veins
make snakes on the backs of hands, and mar
the marbled glassy massiveness of thighs.
Such clotted weight’s worth seeing after centuries
(Pygmalion to Canova) of the nude
as spirit’s outer form, a white flame: Psyche.
How wonderfully St. Gaudens’ slim Diana
stands balanced on one foot, in air, moon-cool,
forever! But no, flesh drags us down,
its mottled earth the painter’s avid ground,
earth innocently ugly, sound asleep,
poor nakedness, sunk angel, sack of phlegm.
Intr-o carte despre "harem" (o institutie mult mai complexa decit ceea ce se zice despre ea), se povestea cum sultanul era servit de catre 10 pina la 40 de odalisce pentru ca sa-si bea cafeluta matinala, doua ii aranjau vesmintele si barba in asa fel incit sa nu se umple de zoaie cind incepea sorbitul, o alta culegea apa proaspata si rece, alta prajea boabele de cafea, alta le macina, alta macina cardamomul, alta se ocupa de nisip si prepara focul mic pe care o alta urma sa plaseze ibricul si toate cele descrise mai'nainte, iar acea care trebuia sa se ocupe de fierberea cafelei si sa o puna in ceasca de care buzele sultanului urmau sa se atinga, era odalisca... careia ii venise sorocul sa se marite si sa paraseasca haremul..., daca si NUMAI daca, reusea sa supravegheze si sa culeaga spuma somptuoasa a cafelei !!! Daca o pierdea, sau se pulveriza, neavind densitatea prin care sa se auto-mentina, ... acea odalisca nu se mai marita si raminea dezonorata pe vecie !!!
Chiar si in zilele noastre, preparatul cafele turcesti este legat de cutuma matrimoniala.
Mireasa este judecata dupa spuma si gustul cafelei, ca pe vremuri...
Pina si mirele trebuie sa treaca testul cafelei: el primeste o cafea in care mireasa in loc de zahar pune sare (brrr !!). Daca in timp ce o soarbe expresia lui faciala denota doar incintare si placere, dovedeste ca este un barbat cumpatat, iar casatoria este binecuvintata.

Desi in viata de toate zilele as fi avut grija sa pastrez o distanta care sa ma fereasca de prezenta fizica a lui Nabokov (adica m-as fi ferit de el ca de dracu`), admiratia mea pentru acest personaj nu are limita ...
Evident ca m-am bucurat ca finally "Nabokov Theory on Butterfly Evolution Is Vindicated"
Few professional lepidopterists took these ideas seriously during Nabokov’s lifetime. But in the years since his death in 1977, his scientific reputation has grown. And over the past 10 years, a team of scientists has been applying gene-sequencing technology to his hypothesis about how Polyommatus blues evolved. On Tuesday in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, they reported that Nabokov was absolutely right.
Eu l-am crezut atunci cind a sustinut ca felul subtil, sublim, satyr, in care ne-a prezentat el pe efemerismul nymphetei Lolita, nu avea nici o iota de pedophilie (cum a fost acuzat de obtuzimea burgheza),
ci era o translatare a studiului si observatiilor sale pasionale asupra acelei specii de un paradox unic, desemnata in toate limbile lumii prin cuvinte cu rezonanta frematatoare care sa sugereze zbaterea aripilor lor pudrate in culori altminteri de nedescris, "fluture", "farfala", butterfly", "papillon", "бабочкa"...
Ramine deci speranta ca si teoria mea legata de fluturi, sa fie cindva adeverita stiintific,
si anume ca Omul s-ar fi format din incrucisarea cimpanzeului cu fluturele ...
Si in teoria mea este vorba de un fluturas albastru.
PS. am mai descoperit si alte afinitati cu maestrul:
Si eu am evitat sa invat limba germana;
Si eu am aceeasi malformatie: Nu gindesc in cuvinte (chiar m-am certat cu multi prieteni pe aceasta tema)!
Mare mi-a fost placerea sa citesc cele de mai jos:
I don't think in any language. I think in images. I don't believe that people think in languages. They don't move their lips when they think. It is only a certain type of illiterate person who moves his lips as he reads or ruminates. No, I think in images, and now and then a Russian phrase or an English phrase will form with the foam of the brainwave, but that’s about all.
(From a BBC Interview, 1962)
Hmmm, cred ca voi exclude ultima fraza, aia cu Yes-sayer. Pare imposibil pentru mine."Today everybody permits himself the expression of his wish and dearest thought; hence I, too, shall say what it is that I wish for myself today, and what was the first thought to run across my heart this year – what thought shall for me be the reason, warranty, and sweetness of my life henceforth.
I want to learn more and more to see as beautiful what is necessary in things: then I shall be one of those who make things beautiful. Amor fati [=love of fate]: let that be my love henceforth!
I do not want to wage war against what is ugly. I do not want to accuse; I do not even want to accuse those who accuse. Looking away shall be my only negation. And all in all and on the whole: some day I wish to be only a Yes-sayer"
(Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, 1882)

In Wallace's view, Wittgenstein had left us, again, without the possibility of contact with the outside world. As he told McCaffery, the Investigations "eliminated solipsism but not the horror." The only difference between this new predicament and that of the Tractatus was that rather than being trapped alone in our private thoughts, we were trapped together, with other people, in the institution of language. This was warmer than solipsism, but, as another form of being sealed-off from reality, it was cold comfort. Explaining this disheartening realization, Wallace said that "unfortunately we're still stuck with the idea that there's this world of referents out there that we can never really join or know because we're stuck in here, in language, even if we're at least all in here together."


"It has often struck me as ironical that Wittgenstein is criticised for being a quietist. It is true that he said philosophy leaves everything as it is. This has wrongly been interpreted as meaning that according to Wittgenstein philosophy is impotent – that it is powerless to affect anything at all. This is a gross misinterpretation of what he wrote. It also seems to me the exact opposite of the truth. What Wittgenstein says should be left alone is the grammar of our language. It’s not our business to devise better grammars. Our business is to tidy up linguistic or conceptual confusions rooted, among other places, in existing grammar. What we can do is clarify and disentangle conceptual confusions in the sciences..."Si eu cred ca gramatica este un organism viu, un produs autentic al istoriei unui neam, care o naste in mod natural, in afara pacatului de imperechiere, in afara unui program prestabilit, insa...,
de La Hare (1606-1656)Imi place sa citesc carti despre gramatica diverselor limbi, chiar daca nu invat si nu vorbesc limbile respective. Le citesc ca pe romane-detectiv, amuzindu-ma la incercarile specialistilor de a extrage reguli didactice pentru explicarea acestui produs misterios.
Eu decid la care din ele sa caut raspuns.- de ce la englezi exista doar the , acelasi si pentru masc. si pentru fem., si pentru fiinte si pentru obiecte, pe cind ...
- la olandezi toate cuvintele, fie ele fiinte, fie obiecte, fie ele masc. fie fem. primesc articolul de, in afara de o mare categorie de cuvinte, fie ele fiinte, fie obiecte, fie ele masc. fie fem. care, cf. unei reguli "misterioase, nescrise" (zic ei), primesc articolul het ? si...
- de ce la români nu numai ca se face diferentiere intre masc. si fem., dar articolul nici nu este o entitate aparte, ci incastrat in cuvint, -ul, -a, la sfirsitul lui ? Asta nu se intimpla cu surorile latine, franceza, italiana...
Si de ce exista ARTA ? "In fact, because Christianity developed out of Judaism, and Islam grew out of both, similarities and allusions are also the markers of great differences. Each religion aggressively reinterpreted its predecessors, accepting its sacred texts but radically altering their implications and meanings -> ..."Temele prezentate in stravechi manuscrise accentuaza atit fundamentele comune, cit si diferentele de interpretare ale lor :
Judaism...E-heeei, daca eram acum la New York, acolo ma aflam !
Christianity...
Islam...
Abraham
Moses
Jesus
Muhammad
Scripturile...
Daaa ..., a reflectat mamitzu, exista multi oameni talentati, pe lumea asta!